revised and updated version
this is an abbreviated version for a forth-coming book with even more proofs and why
"we simply cannot make scripture say what it does not say"
-rory moore
This is the condensed version of my book on the same subject.
I wrote an article or two from what I saw written in scripture, and also engaged in numerous debates and discussions, eventually becoming convinced what appeared to be the majority view was not what I read in scripture.
I also noticed a pattern. The angels/ sons of God/ aliens/ nephilim and some of the UFO crowd all spoke the same thing, made the same assumptions, added the same ideas and often made the scriptures say what they do not say in order to paint a picture of imagination-fired plausibility connecting human genealogy to “extra-terrestrials” or half-human hybrids.
I want to repeat this phrase for emphasis:
“they often made the scriptures say what they do not say”.
And that my friends, is where a “strong delusion” sets in no matter what the subject is about. To refresh our thoughts, here is the passage:
Genesis 6,
1 And it came to
pass, when men began to multiply on the face of earth ground, and daughters were born to them,
2 the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and took them wives of all that they
chose.
3 And The LORD said, My spirit shall not strive
with man forever, for that he also is flesh: yet shall his days be a hundred and twenty
years.
4 The *Nephilim were in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of God came unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them: the same were the mighty men that were of old, the men of renown.
4 The *Nephilim were in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of God came unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them: the same were the mighty men that were of old, the men of renown.
(* H5307; properly, a feller, a bully or tyrant: - giant.)
5 The LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth
5 The LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth
Let’s use the "sword of the Spirit" to see if we can prove the
truth of a commonly accepted doctrine.
This doctrine leads either to or away from the path of scripture into regions
of thinking that have us chasing pre-Adamic creation, alien invasions, Adam
having two wives, and all sorts of fanciful, unprofitable “learning”.
There are two critical points I would like to test:
1. Does scripture say angels married human wives <daughters of men> ?
2. Does scripture define “sons of God” as angels or men?
1. Does scripture say angels married human wives <daughters of men> ?
2. Does scripture define “sons of God” as angels or men?
The trouble usually begins with that phrase in Genesis 6:4, “sons
of God”.
WHO are those “sons
of God”? Were they angels or were they men?
Let’s test
this:
1. Jesus spoke of men who cannot marry in the resurrection:
Matthew. 22:29 Jesus said to them, You err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God.
Matthew. 22:29 Jesus said to them, You err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God.
30) For in the
resurrection they <i.e. men> neither marry, nor are given in marriage,
but are as angels in heaven.
but are as angels in heaven.
-Men who achieve the resurrection do not marry, have sexual
union, or make babies, because they “are as angels in heaven”.
- But is there written anywhere that angels in heaven married other
angels or humans?
- And are angels ever directly named “sons of God”?
Again, Jesus spoke of
angels and sons of God in Luke 20
34) and Jesus said to them, The sons of
this world marry, and are given in marriage:
35) but they that are accounted worthy to attain
to
that world, and the resurrection
from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage:
36) for neither can they die any more: as they are *equal to the angels;
and are sons of God, being sons of the resurrection.
36) for neither can they die any more: as they are *equal to the angels;
and are sons of God, being sons of the resurrection.
*equal to the angels”: G2465 ἰσάγγελος is aggelos “ like an
angel, that is, angelic:
- equal to the angels.”
- equal to the angels.”
NOTICE: 👉 Jesus said men are sons of God because
they
were sons of God by the resurrection.
But are *any* angels ever called "sons of God by the resurrection"?
The honest answer is NO.
But are *any* angels ever called "sons of God by the resurrection"?
The honest answer is NO.
From what Jesus said above, the Old Testament saints who died in faith, are “equal to angels”, and who are
"not given in marriage”,
as “angels in heaven” are likewise
not married, and they are called “sons of God” by Jesus, before His
resurrection!
Point: In this “sons
of God” passage, angels were not included as sons of God by the resurrection
even though men are, and men would be as “equal
to the angels”. (equal means "like" or as)
In Genesis 6:2 after men multiplied, it says: that the sons
of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives
of all that they chose.
But no angels are ever spoken of as married to human wives, and the genealogy's in the Bible bear witness to an absence of angelic paternity.
Read Jesus' words
above very carefully.
Sons of God
Error correction #2:
In the Hebrew text, “angels” are not even mentioned specifically until first mention Genesis 16:7
“And the angel of The LORD found her by a
fountain of water in the wilderness”.
Let’s look at the
Hebrew word for “angel”.
It is “malak”. (def.: messenger, representative, angel, the theophanic angel)
It is “malak”. (def.: messenger, representative, angel, the theophanic angel)
Let’s look at the
Hebrew word for “sons”.
It is “ben” or “bane”.
It is “ben” or “bane”.
(son, grandson,
member of a group son, male child,
grandson , children (pl. - male and
female) youth, young men (pl.)young (of
animals) sons (as characterization, i.e.
sons of injustice [for un- righteous men]or sons of God [for angels] people (of a nation) (pl.) of lifeless things, i.e. sparks, stars,
arrows)
Yet Jesus said angels do not marry, which was only stated as
the union of man and women.
Could these “sons of God” be angels because “ben”
has a minor inclusion “sons of God for
angels” in the definition?
In scripture, 4,842 times “ben”
was used in the Old Testament, but ZERO times translated as “angels” in the ASV, and 0 for 4,906 in the KJV.
Without adding “angels” into any text, not one
verse expressly, directly, or specifically speaks of “angels” as sons of God,
but it does say that of men.
Therefore
the Hebrew language testifies against “sons
of God” as angels.
Next we find in Job the phrase “sons of God” used.
Job 1:6 Now it came
to pass on the day when the sons of God came to present themselves
before the
LORD, that Satan also came among them.
2:1 again it came to pass on the day when the
sons of God came to present themselves
before the
Lord, that Satan came also among them to present himself before.
38:7 when the morning stars sang together, And all
the sons of God shouted for joy?
-Again there is no
specific identification that "sons ("ben") of God" were angels (malak).
-“morning stars” can be shown as a metaphor for saints of
God and children of Abraham, but I prefer not to insert any metaphor or
assumption into the text here.
Now for New
Testament "the sons of God" references:
Luke 20:34 Jesus
said unto them, The sons of this world marry, and are
given in marriage:
Luke 20:36 for
neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels;
and ARE sons of God, being sons of the resurrection.
and ARE sons of God, being sons of the resurrection.
Now that passage could end the debate, but there are more “sons
of God” identified explicitly, directly, and are expressly designated:
Galatians 3:26 For you are all sons of God, through faith, in Christ Jesus.
Ephesians 1:5 having fore-ordained us unto adoption as sons through Jesus Christ...
Ephesians 1:5 having fore-ordained us unto adoption as sons through Jesus Christ...
1Jn 3:2 beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it does not
yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall
be LIKE him; for we shall see him as he is.
What we see and do not see in the above scriptures:
-Are any angels, fallen or otherwise directly, specifically called “sons of God?" -NO!
-Are the men, “they that are accounted worthy” called “sons of God” -YES!
-Are Old Testament saints who were “they of faith”, and
“sons of Abraham”, also “sons of the
resurrection” and “accounted worthy” ? -YES!
Are the same “sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus”
called “sons of God”? -YES!
Did Abraham have faith and look for Jesus? -YES!
Jesus proved it and said “Abraham saw my day and rejoiced”. John 8:56
Now we have two
witnesses in Jesus Christ and Witness Paul in agreement telling us who the “sons of God”
really are.
If that were not enough, we see "angels" (aggelos)
used 176 times in the New Testament and
not one single time are they referred to as "sons" or "sons of
God"!
("Aggelos", Gr, #32, "angel(s), messenger(s).
Drilling down:
If that were not enough, "angel(s) are mentioned 74 times in the book of Revelation.
None are "sons of God" in any context..
"sons of God" as a phrase is used SIX times in the New Testament. Six is the number of man.
Drilling down:
If that were not enough, "angel(s) are mentioned 74 times in the book of Revelation.
None are "sons of God" in any context..
"sons of God" as a phrase is used SIX times in the New Testament. Six is the number of man.
Angelic
Sons of God Error Corrected, reason number 3:
In scripture, the Word instructs us that a teaching and
truth are built “line upon line, line upon line”.
Furthermore, scripture tells us that “in the mouth of two or
three witnesses let every word be established”.
The premise that fallen-angels-sons-of-God, were able to
make babies in marriage with human women have the following number of verses to
additionally witness that theory:
---0--- In all the so and so begat so and so, it is always attributed to humans with the exception of Jesus Christ who was begotten by the Father.
Therefore it is correct,
there are no verses in either the Old or New Testaments pointing to women
making babies with fallen angels.
But by way of supposition and assumption ("interpolation", i.e. that is making scripture say what it does not say), is the idea believed.
Jesus did not refer to any “return of the nephilum” as an end time warning
about the “days of Noah”.
He DID refer to signs to watch out for in Matthew 24 and Luke 21, but neither Jesus or Paul wrote of nephilum when warning of “the last days” or end times.
He DID refer to signs to watch out for in Matthew 24 and Luke 21, but neither Jesus or Paul wrote of nephilum when warning of “the last days” or end times.
What are the "signs" both Jesus and Paul most warned about?
-specifically it is "deceivers" "false teachers" "seducing spirits" and "demon doctrines".
-specifically it is "deceivers" "false teachers" "seducing spirits" and "demon doctrines".
Amazing however, there IS a
place where Jesus said the devil himself could father children.
Jesus told the Jews and pharisees in John 8:44 You are of your father the devil,
and the lusts of your father it is your
will to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and stands not in the truth, because there
is no truth in him.
Do you imagine the fallen arch angel Lucifer-devil have sexual relations with the
mothers of the pharisees?
Jesus clearly said they were of their father, the devil.
Question:
HOW did the devil “father” the pharisees?
-did the devil have sexual relations with Israelite women and how could the devil father human children?
Question:
HOW did the devil “father” the pharisees?
-did the devil have sexual relations with Israelite women and how could the devil father human children?
Do you think the devil could have physical sex to
impregnate women, make giants, and procreate “nephillum”, that he would have stayed very busy making as many as possible all through history?
-of course we know that is preposterous.
Let's try to discern just how a devil spirit being could be a father of humans.
-of course we know that is preposterous.
Let's try to discern just how a devil spirit being could be a father of humans.
Here is
what Jesus said about "good seed" and "tares" who are of bad
seed.
Matthew 13:38 and the good seed, these are the sons of the kingdom;
and the tares are the sons of the evil one
Matthew 13:38 and the good seed, these are the sons of the kingdom;
and the tares are the sons of the evil one
How did tares
become "SONS of the evil one"?
Are we are supposed to accept that a one-night stand back
there in Genesis 6 by sexy fallen angels, that for some odd reason never again
happened in scripture, nor was spoken of as such, nor warned about, is somehow fit for Christian doctrinal consumption?
No friends, scripture is not of private interpretation.
It is error to isolate one passage and imply a doctrinal precept built around one verse, with no corroborating scripture testimony, and we are building our case for the truth.
Sons Of God
Error Corrected Reason 4:
God created “seed” and set into motion a law that said seed
would reproduce “after like kind”.
An apple seed brings forth an apple tree. A cows “seed”
brings forth cattle-calves.
Angels cannot reproduce with humans.
Angels are not credited with creating life.
Angels ARE called “ministering spirits”, and “a spirit has not flesh and bone” as Jesus said, even though angels have appeared in flesh all through scripture.
1Corinthians 1539 says there IS a body of flesh that is different from earthly flesh.
There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another.
Angels cannot reproduce with humans.
Angels are not credited with creating life.
Angels ARE called “ministering spirits”, and “a spirit has not flesh and bone” as Jesus said, even though angels have appeared in flesh all through scripture.
1Corinthians 1539 says there IS a body of flesh that is different from earthly flesh.
There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another.
Point: we cannot prove angels have bones, blood, or the internal capacity for sexual
reproduction, any or all of which are needed to affirm the theory of angels
marrying human women and making babies who became giants.
Seed reproduces kind, and the only seed a seducing spirit
can sow is spiritual seed via words, i.e. “doctrines
of demons” which are errors and lies.
That was the method of the devil by which deceived Eve in
the garden, a demon doctrine deceived her and it was spiritual words that she believed.
A lie is a spiritual seed. By it, humanity was contaminated by a sin nature.
"kind" reproduces like kind.
A lie is a spiritual seed. By it, humanity was contaminated by a sin nature.
"kind" reproduces like kind.
24 And God
said, Let the earth bring forth living creatures after their kind, cattle, and
creeping things, and beasts of the earth after their kind: and it was so.
25 And God made
the beasts of the earth after their kind, and the cattle
after their kind, and
everything that crept upon the ground after its kind: ...
The phrase "after their kind" created and set order in creation.
The phrase "after their kind" created and set order in creation.
There are ZERO scriptures stating that angels (also called spirits)
can reproduce flesh.
That which is begotten of the flesh is flesh, that which is of the Spirit is spirit". –John 3:6
That which is begotten of the flesh is flesh, that which is of the Spirit is spirit". –John 3:6
WARNINGS:
1Tim 1:3) As I exhorted thee to tarry at Ephesus,
when I was going into Macedonia, that you might charge certain men not to teach a different doctrine, 4)
neither to give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questionings....
-You might think the angels are sons of God marrying human women doctrine was in Paul’s mind when he wrote that passage about “endless genealogies” and “which minister questionings” which is so illustrated by the arguments on this subject.
-You might think the angels are sons of God marrying human women doctrine was in Paul’s mind when he wrote that passage about “endless genealogies” and “which minister questionings” which is so illustrated by the arguments on this subject.
"Fables" is “muthos”,
which is a tale, that is, fiction, (myth).
There are warnings about giving heed to “seducing spirits”
and doctrines of demons.
“Seducing spirits”
are not about sex with human women, it is their “doctrines” that spiritually
impregnate the “sons of God”.
And that is
why Jesus told them they were of their father the devil.
Today, myth and fable
are mainstream, and sell well.
But what about the Book of....?
Extra-Biblical books are referenced in scripture itself and many books are written that will take us into other realms based on a Biblical word or phrase.
Yet we are forbidden to establish doctrine apart from scripture, and without additional witness in scripture itself. I will return to the "What about....?" below.
But what about the Book of....?
Extra-Biblical books are referenced in scripture itself and many books are written that will take us into other realms based on a Biblical word or phrase.
Yet we are forbidden to establish doctrine apart from scripture, and without additional witness in scripture itself. I will return to the "What about....?" below.
Sons Of God
Error Corrected Reason 5:
Definitively there are simply no scriptures in the New Testament, say anything remotely
close to the fallen angels making babies with humans” error, and it is not stated in the references to the angels in
Jude and in 2peter 2.
-Are fallen angels
ever called “sons of God” in the New Testament? NO!
-Does the New Testament even mention angels and sonship? YES!
- "For to which of the angels said He at any
time, You are my Son, this day have I
begotten thee? -Heb 1:5
Can we say *BOOM* ?
👉We cannot find anywhere God said to any angel He had "begotten" them and called an angel "son".
Can we say *BOOM* ?
👉We cannot find anywhere God said to any angel He had "begotten" them and called an angel "son".
Those holding the fallen angels are “sons of God” in Genesis
6 and Job, find themselves directly contradicting God saying to which of his
angels at any time did He say “thou art My son”!
Angels are expressly called "spirits".
Heb. 1:13 But of
which of the angels has he said at any time, Sit thou on my right hand,
Till I make thine enemies the footstool of
thy feet?
14) Are they not all ministering spirits.
Since angels are spirit-beings:
Can a fallen angel produce human or angelic sperm in order to impregnate a human woman?
Can a fallen angel produce human or angelic sperm in order to impregnate a human woman?
Not according to the law of "after their kind", and not according to Jesus:
John 3:6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that
which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
"flesh": The flesh, denotes human nature and the
physical substance of human kind.
"spirit": A spirit, i.e. a
simple essence, devoid of all or at least all grosser matter, and possessed of the power of knowing,
desiring, deciding, and acting.
A spirit can inhabit a body (as satan entered into Judas), a
spirit can appear as a man, but never is a spirit credited with a capability to reproduce human seed or hybrids.
The ONLY seed an evil fallen angel can sow is a lie.
Just because angels materialized into human form and ate
food does not mean mean they had every human capability including reproduction.
The scripture does not state the attribute that
angels can make human “seed”, and
cross breed, as seed begets "kind" after its’ own "kind".
Matthew 13:38 and the good seed, these are the sons of the
kingdom; and the tares are the sons of the
evil one”. That's right, sons of
the "evil one" are "tares" because they receive the
"seed" of the devil, i.e. lies.
Were "sons of
Belial" angels or human?
Some examples of this phrasing is here:
1 Samuel 2:12 Now the sons of Eli were sons of Belial; they knew not the LORD.
1 Samuel 2:12 Now the sons of Eli were sons of Belial; they knew not the LORD.
1 Samuel 10:27 But the children of Belial said,
How shall this man save us?
Deuteronomy 13:13 Certain men, the children of Belial, are gone
out from among you, and have withdrawn the inhabitants of their
city, saying, Let us go and serve other gods…
Judges 19:22
Now as they were making their hearts merry, behold, the men of the city, certain sons of Belial, ..and spoke to the master of the house, the old man, saying, Bring forth the man that came into thine house, that we may know him.
Now as they were making their hearts merry, behold, the men of the city, certain sons of Belial, ..and spoke to the master of the house, the old man, saying, Bring forth the man that came into thine house, that we may know him.
We ask, if sons of God are fallen angels, and both men and
fallen angels are of their father the devil
then what made both "kind" sons of the devil
-was it physical procreation or was it spiritual by following a lie and rebellion?
The answer is obvious.
then what made both "kind" sons of the devil
-was it physical procreation or was it spiritual by following a lie and rebellion?
The answer is obvious.
Sons Of God
Error Corrected Reason 6:
Warning,
fables-fables-fables. "What about the book of..."
Jesus rebuked the Jews "You do err, not knowing the scriptures".
Jesus said in the very passage where He spoke concerning angels, men, and sons of God.
Jesus said in the very passage where He spoke concerning angels, men, and sons of God.
Some folks believe
the Book of Enoch is scripture.
However if the Book of Enoch is not verifiable God inspiried scripture, it is not to be included as a witness to a doctrine. -Jesus did not refer to it or quote from it.
In his prophetic writings, Paul did not quote from it.
Jude did write " (v14) And to these also Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied, saying, Behold, the Lord came with ten thousands of his holy ones.
However if the Book of Enoch is not verifiable God inspiried scripture, it is not to be included as a witness to a doctrine. -Jesus did not refer to it or quote from it.
In his prophetic writings, Paul did not quote from it.
Jude did write " (v14) And to these also Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied, saying, Behold, the Lord came with ten thousands of his holy ones.
Did you note that the mention of Enoch’s prophesy is not
prefaced “it is written…”?
The prophecy is true because it is given by the Holy Spirit and is written in Jude as a witness, but nowhere do we have confirmation from anyone that “The Book of Enoch” is scripture and it would be witnessed somewhere in scripture if it were.
The prophecy is true because it is given by the Holy Spirit and is written in Jude as a witness, but nowhere do we have confirmation from anyone that “The Book of Enoch” is scripture and it would be witnessed somewhere in scripture if it were.
Quoting a prophesy from Enoch is no different as other words
are quoted from many other prophets
The "Book of Enoch" and the writings of Enoch are nowhere validated as scripture, by the scripture.
Contrast that thought.
Isaiah is quoted in the New Testament.
Daniel is quoted in the New Testament.
Moses is quoted in the New Testament.
Other prophets are quoted, and often framed with "as it is written".
The "Book of Enoch" and the writings of Enoch are nowhere validated as scripture, by the scripture.
Contrast that thought.
Isaiah is quoted in the New Testament.
Daniel is quoted in the New Testament.
Moses is quoted in the New Testament.
Other prophets are quoted, and often framed with "as it is written".
Others like Enoch also prophesied likewise:
" And there was also a man that prophesied in the name
of Jehovah, Uriah " -Jer. 26:20
".. sons of Asaph, ... who prophesied after the order
of the king." 1Chron 25:2
"Of the sons of
Jeduthun: Gedaliah, and Zeri, and Jeshaiah, Hashabiah, and Mattithiah, six,
under the hands of their father Jeduthun with the harp, who prophesied in
giving thanks and praising Jehovah." 1Chron 25:3
So we see that even though others "prophesied" as
Enoch did, the "Book of Enoch" is not given as scripture but a
prophesy by Enoch and is witnessed by scripture...
1. 1Timothy 1:4
neither to give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questionings,
rather than a dispensation of God which is in faith; so do I now.
2. 2Timothy 4:4 and will turn away their ears
from the truth, and turn aside unto fables.
3. Titus 1:14 not
giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men who turn away from the truth. (bad fruit turns God's people away from scripture)
4. 2Peter 1:16 For we
did not follow *cunningly devised fables,
when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord
Jesus Christ… ( *cunningly means to continue
in PLAUSIBLE ERROR…)
Once the unvarnished
truth is accepted, the doctrine of
hormone-driven sexy angels marrying or sexually molesting women and making
babies who become giants is shown to be absurd and ridiculous.
Because doctrine is not to be established by one verse, one context, or
assuming scripture means what it does not say.
A true doctrine is established "line upon line..." with mutually supporting scripture.
A true doctrine is established "line upon line..." with mutually supporting scripture.
I submit to you, the reader, that no scripture states that
angels are "sons of God", but scriptures do say that men are called
"sons of God'.
I submit that in no other passage of scripture is there
reference to, or a declaration of angelic spirits having sexual relations with
human women and making babies.
I submit to you that God repeats history and we can
demonstrate that in the scripture.
But I cannot find any repetition of God repeating the alleged "sons of God-fallen angel" theory of them making babies with humans they married.
I submit that Jesus never said or alluded to that in the season of His return, as in the days of Noah, that there would be "a return of the Nephilim".
But I cannot find any repetition of God repeating the alleged "sons of God-fallen angel" theory of them making babies with humans they married.
I submit that Jesus never said or alluded to that in the season of His return, as in the days of Noah, that there would be "a return of the Nephilim".
In closing, there are scriptures that cannot lie, but men can be deceived into lying about them.
Read them with care and decide for yourself.
... the Nephilim
were in the earth in those days, and also after that,
when the sons of God came unto the daughters of men,
when the sons of God came unto the daughters of men,
... neither can they
die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are sons of God, being
sons of the resurrection
... For unto which
of the angels said he at any time, Thou
art my son ?
*** Further scripture notes on “Sons of God”:
If
"sons" of God means or included "angels", then there is not
a single evidence of that in these passages which specifically and expressly mention
"sons" of God:
Exodus 4:22 And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith the
LORD, Israel is my son
Deut 32:19 And the Lord saw it, and abhorred them, Because
of the provocation of his sons and his daughters
John 1:12 But as
many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God even
to them that believe on his name:
1Chron 17:13 (of Solomon) I will be his father, and he shall be my son:
and I will not take my mercy away from him
1 Chron 22:10 He shall build an house for my name; and he
shall be my son, and I will be his father
Hosea 11:1 When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and
called my son out of Egypt.
Rev 21:7 He that
overcomes shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my
son.
How does one become "a son of God"?
Did OT saints “overcome by faith?
Did OT saints “overcome by faith?
Did they believe
God?
Did they “see from
afar” the promises of God in Christ?
Were they sons of God by the resurrection?
God tells us:
God tells us:
Isaiah 43:6 I will say to the north, Give up; and to the
south, Keep not back: bring my sons from far, and my
daughters from the ends of the earth;
Isaiah 45:11 Thus says the LORD, the Holy One of Israel,
and his Maker, Ask me of things to come concerning my sons, and concerning the work of my hands command ye
me.
2Cor. 6:18 And will be a Father to you, and ye shall be my sons and
daughters, said the Lord Almighty.
Hebrews 11 tells
us who the “sons of God by FAITH in Christ Jesus” were:
4 By faith Abel 5 By faith Enoch 7 By faith Noah,8 By faith
Abraham
13 These all died in faith, not having
received the promises, but having seen them and greeted them from afar
24 By faith Moses...
26 accounting the reproach of Christ
greater riches
Galatians 3:26 For ye are all sons of God, through faith,
in Christ Jesus.
Romans 8:14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these
are sons of God.
Luke 20:36 for neither can they die any more: for they are
equal unto the angels; and are sons of
God, being sons of the resurrection.
Not once are angels “sons” in any of those passages..
Genesis 3:15 and I will put enmity between thee and the
woman, and between thy seed and her seed: he shall bruise thy head, and thou
shalt bruise his heel.
Should we accept that both the woman and the serpent have
"seed", and that the serpent was the devil,
both are prophesied to have "seed", in Hebrew
meaning ones posterity.
Since both would have a "posterity", did the devil
continue to have human children through sexual reproduction? -or would his
children be those that received the same lie, and have the same nature as the
serpent??
-just as the pharisees who were called children of the devil.
-just as the pharisees who were called children of the devil.
-The woman's "seed" is recognized as Jesus who
would come to bruise the "head" of satan.
Luke 6:35 But love your enemies, and do them good, and
lend, never despairing; and your reward shall be great, and you shall be sons of the Most
High
..............
I noticed that NONE of the angels
mentioned in scripture such as Michael and Gabriel, are ever specifically
called "sons of God", not in any passage in the entire
Bible!!
Can you
find non-human "sons of God here?
Deuteronomy 32:19 And The LORD saw it, … Because
of the provocation of his sons and his daughters.
Judges 5:5 And
the children of Israel dwelt among the Canaanites, the
Hittites, and the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the
Jebusites:
( the children of Israel WERE called “sons of God”)
( the children of Israel WERE called “sons of God”)
6 and they (the sons of God,-Israel) took their daughters (of pagan men) to
be their wives, (as married to the Israeli sons of God) and
gave their own daughters (the children of Israel) to their sons
(of men) and served their gods.
Let's think, do these include
angels as sons of God?
Isaiah 43:6 I will
say to the north, Give up; and to the south, Keep not back; bring
my sons from far, and my daughters from the end of the earth
2 Corinthians 6:18
And I will be to you a Father, And you shall be to me sons and
daughters, says the Lord Almighty.
Why is there no commandment in the word of God for man not
to cohabitate with angels?
When God warned against intermarriage with parents and family members in the law, and severely warned of adulterous marriages, and warned against sex with animals, and warned against homosexual sex, and warned about marriage with unbelievers, and warned against unmarried sexual relations, He did not give warning against marriage or sex with fallen angels.
There is*nothing* in the New Testament in regard to angels making babies with humans but there is repeated warnings regarding immorality and fornication among humans.
Since no angels are ever directly called “sons of God”, and since no scripture witnesses that angels can or did marry human women and make babies, we categorically reject this teaching and pray the Lord will open the eyes of those who are driven to contend for it.
Since no angels are ever directly called “sons of God”, and since no scripture witnesses that angels can or did marry human women and make babies, we categorically reject this teaching and pray the Lord will open the eyes of those who are driven to contend for it.
We simply cannot “go beyond that which is written” and try
to make the scripture say what it does not say, even if the arguments seem
plausible.
Copyright 2014 by Rory Moore
