Search This Blog

Thursday, September 28, 2023

 



The Dragon Dream: Linda, 8-20-05 

 

I was in a valley between two mountains with many other people.   

 

The mountain on the left showed some vegetation on the side and some buildings on top.   

The mountain on my right was barren, dry and empty.   

 

As I observed the dry mountain on the right I noticed the outline of a huge dragon appearing in the side of it.    

 

Then the picture-outline of the dragon began moving and emerging out of the dirt, becoming 3 dimensional before it began roaring and going after the people.   
 
Everyone started screaming in panic and running for their lives. 

 

 Some ran to the other mountain and started climbing to get away from the beast 

 

I climbed up the same mountain as the others and when I got to the top there was a boxy building complex.  I was frantically looking for a place to hide inside and the building was empty.   


While in one of the rooms I looked out the window and saw out of a window on the left, at a lower level on the mountain, heavy yucca plant vegetation covering the landscape.   

 

On a lower level of the mountain were two armies in black berets, black pants, a diagonal strap only one army had blue shirts, the other red shirts 

and were all carrying weapons.   

 

Theses two opposing forces were moving through a field of tall corn which hid them from each other. 


The interpretation will be sent by those that request. It is unfolding before us.

 

Saturday, September 16, 2023

Order In God's House: Men and Women Ministry






 Order In God's House: Men and Women in Ministry







In a fellowship we attended the question of female apostles came up and sparked a short, but lively discussion.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐝𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧.

There is much cultural “transgendering”, feminism, and male-neutering de-masculization mirrored in the confused and tangled corporate church world, and our secular world also (by design).
The satanic blurring of gender distinction is stark evidence, and you are likely aware of men in women’s sports, locker room showers, and bathrooms.
Sadly the church system led the way for this, the same system we were once a part of as we blissfully ignored the plumbline of God’s Word. I would like to point out some things not taught or were intentionally overlooked in most churches regarding Ministry and who does what.
The major roles of church oversight were stated in Ephesian 4:11 by our beloved brother Paul the apostle.
And He gave some to be apostles, and some prophets, and some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers,

-their purpose is:
12 for the perfecting (maturing) of the saints for the work of the ministry, and for the edifying of the body of Christ.
and also here:
1 Corinthians 12:28 And God has set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues.
For the purpose and focus of this study, I will use their definitive Greek terms:
1. apostle. ἀπόστολος apostolos Part of Speech: masculine noun
2. prophet: προφήτης prophētēs Part of Speech masculine noun
3. evangelist: εὐαγγελιστής euangelistēs Part of Speech masculine noun
4. pastors: ποιμήν poimēn Part of Speech masculine noun
These are the headship gifts of overseership to serve (not dominate over) Christ’s body when Christ is the head and responsible for teaching the apostles’ “doctrine”, which the apostles received from Christ before and after He ascended to God.
𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐓𝐈𝐓𝐋𝐄𝐃 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐆𝐨𝐝’𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥e. -much to the chagrin of the harlot church system many of us came out of.
Note that there are no feminine nouns in Ephesian 4:11 in the above even though women are “prophetesses” in both Testaments.
The word “prophetess” is used eight times of for a number of women in the entire Bible.
But "prophet" occurs 244 times in 227 verses in the KJV, and prophets delivered virtually all of the scripture. The scriptures are the “word of God” and the “word” is likened to “seed”, i.e. sperma, as in the parable “a sower sowed the seed” that Jesus taught.
Most, if not all of scripture was the seed of the Word that came through prophets.

"Neither male nor female"? Some argue from Galatians 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female; for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

However I would point out that when it came to the calling to overseership, Paul gave definitive qualifications in 1 Timothy 3, and Titus 1. -Those qualifications in both passages included "being the husband of one wife". What happened to "neither male nor female?" one might ask.

He also gave designated instructions to husbands, wives, children, employers, and employees who are also Christians, yet they do not lose their gender or role distinctions with "husbands love your wives".
Women may speak!
He gives all in the assembly, including women to prophesy, speak in tongues, interpret, testify, pray, sing, all of which are vocally expressed. 1 Corinthians 14.
It is amazing to me how easily these instructions are ignored or explained away by people that teach others.
I have an article on qualifications but simply reading carefully what Paul instructed and commanded those pastors will tell you what we should believe and follow..

Let's take a look at:
1. apostle. ἀπόστολος apostolos Part of Speech: masculine noun
2. prophet: προφήτης prophētēs Part of Speech masculine noun
3. evangelist: εὐαγγελιστής euangelistēs Part of Speech masculine noun
4. pastors: ποιμήν poimēn Part of Speech masculine noun other masculine nouns of note: 5. RABBI
6. Levites 7. Sanhedrin 8. Patriarchs 9. Pharisees 10. Christ 11. Priest 12. Ruler of the synagogue: a phrase, masculine noun.
In the above ministries, both Greek and Hebrew have clear and distinct gendered noun forms.
Let’s compare them to some other words.
𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐬:
Hebrew Transliteration nᵊḇî'â Part of Speech 𝐟𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐧
Greek: prophētis Part of Speech feminine noun
prophetess” points: It is not listed among the ministries in Ephesian 4:11, nor is it a qualification for overseership in 1Tim. 3 and Titus 1.
In Acts 8, Philip’s four virgin daughters did “prophesy”, which is a verb, and a verb is not a position of oversight-eldership. To “prophesy” is a gift that is shared among Godly women and men in the church body, with mention in 1 Corinthians 14.
Moses' sister Miriam is the first mentioned prophetess and apparently she over-stepped her place when she gave voice to her dislike and criticism of Moses wife. Then she and Aaron attempted to usurp and take some authority over Moses, the prophet.
As a result, God put a leprosy on her for 7 days, but not Aaron, and she repented. When folks point to Debra as an "authority" under the law, they should also note the incident with Miriam and Moses in Numbers 12.
The last <not as a literal person> prophetess mentioned in scripture is Jezebel in Revelation chapter 2, she also was a usurper and teacher of men in the church. God gave space for “her” to repent.
And I gave her space to repent of her fornication, and she repented not.. “
Her spiritual fornication was receiving the words and teachings of many men and using their words to teach men, i.e. prophets.
Places demonstrating the absence of feminine authority over men in teaching or leading:
No prophetess is mentioned in Acts 15 where the hotly debated Law and the gentiles was resolved.
No prophetess is mentioned among the Ephesian elders in Acts 20 that Paul gave instructions to.
No prophetess is mentioned as a “ruler of the synagogues” that are mentioned.
No prophetess is specifically mentioned as such, or as an overseer in Paul’s epistles.
This not a chauvinistic put-down, 𝐢𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐆𝐨𝐝 𝐡𝐚𝐬 given 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐆𝐨𝐝𝐥𝐲 𝐦𝐞𝐧 to exercise as they guide the saints.
𝘼𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙛 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙨𝙚, 𝙣𝙤 𝙈𝘼𝙉 𝙞𝙨 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧, 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧, 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙘𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙙 “𝙖 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙨”,
-𝙝𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙, 𝙞𝙣 𝙞𝙜𝙣𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚, 𝙧𝙚𝙛𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙬𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙣 𝙖𝙨 “𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙩𝙨”, 𝙖 𝙢𝙖𝙨𝙘𝙪𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙣𝙤𝙪𝙣.
Can we see that subtle “tranny-ism” perversion of the male’s gift and calling? Some of us do.
Masculine nouns.
In our English translations, some Bible words lose there genderized forms which are obvious in Greek and Hebrew. The important ones are “apostle”, “prophet”, “teacher” “pastor”. All masculine nouns.
Here are some masculine nouns that are obvious:
Uncle. Part of Speech masculine noun
Nephew. Part of Speech masculine noun
Brethren. Part of Speech masculine noun
The rest of those English words are immediately clear as gendered nouns.
𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐬 “𝐩𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫”, “𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫” “𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐥𝐞” 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐨𝐛𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐥 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐩𝐞𝐞𝐥 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐞𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐆𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐤 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐇𝐞𝐛𝐫𝐞𝐰.
I happen to have a Greek friend named “Apostolos”.
Yes, it is the exact same word used in scripture and he is very much a male.
One day I asked him about his name, if girls were ever named “Apostolos” and he assured me with a crystal clear “NO!”.
But in the church system, that distinction is ignored. Are we missing something?
1. apostle. ἀπόστολος apostolos Pronunciation ap-os'-tol-os
Part of Speech: masculine noun
𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐰𝐞 𝐫𝐞-𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐚𝐭 “𝐩𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫”?
-𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐨𝐧 𝐓𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞 𝐚𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐁𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞-𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐬..
4. pastors: ποιμήν Transliteration poimēn (Key) Pronunciation poy-mane'
Part of Speech masculine noun
There is not a single female “co-pastor” in scripture.
A woman "co-pastor" (we knew many of them personally) is like saying a pastor’s wife is “co-husband”.

5.Christ. We KNOW Christ is a man because we know who Christ was in scripture. But if someone heard the word "Christ" without any Bible knowledge, or a small child, one could mistakenly attach the word "Christ" to a woman, the same as they do with "pastor". But the Greek proves the same truth, "Christ" is a masculine noun and attached to Jesus our Lord.
Friends, God made woman to be man’s help mate, not usurp his authority that was created in God’s image.
Does that give a husband an authoritarian-blank-check to lord over her, intimidate, or abuse her?
𝙂𝙤𝙙 𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙗𝙞𝙙!
He will answer to God and may answer to the courts and legal system if he abuses her, injures her, and God help the man that abrogates his responsibility.
We have counseled women to get out and away from abusive men to protect them.
He is called to provide for, love her, honor her, cherish her, protect her, defend her, guide her, lead her to the Lord and guide her in His Words.
Men and women may be one in Christ, but both sexes are given diverse responsibilities in scripture, and our obvious separate physical characteristics do not become non-existent when in Christ.
Gal. 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female; for ye are all one in Christ.
𝗜𝗳 𝘀𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗵𝗶𝘀 “𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗱” 𝗼𝗿 𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝗚𝗼𝗱’𝘀 “𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲” (“naos": noun-masc) 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿 𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁, who is “𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗻”, 1 Corinthians 11:2-5
-𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗣𝗮𝘂𝗹 𝘄𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲 “𝗜 𝗱𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝘁 𝗮 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗻𝗼𝗿 𝘂𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗽 𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗻”.
A woman in Spiritual authority will feminize the men in an assembly, and we are witnesses to that.
Bobbi is not Robert. Tommi is not Thomas.
There are no feminized forms of nouns for “apostle”, “pastor”, ‘brethren”, but there is a feminized “prophetess” for a woman to prophesy. She is never a “prophet. The prophetess’s in the New Testament are not given overseership in violation of the instructions delivered to the churches, but they are a gifted to hear from and speak for God in their gifting.
𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲’𝐬 𝐬𝐚𝐤𝐞, let me opine that the 𝐌𝐄𝐍 seeking to be 𝐓𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐲𝐦𝐞𝐧, 𝐌𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫-𝐏𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐓𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐜𝐡𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐬 that have been invented are partaking of the anti-christ church system, called the "Great Whore of Babylon", and the clergy-laity church system.
What about JUNIA?
Junia, one of seven women mentioned in Paul's greeting in Romans 16:7 is put forth as an apostle by some.
We cannot make her into a masculine-noun "apostolos" however, just as we cannot make her a husband, brother, son, or uncle.
Nor is there any other reference to her as an apostle to confirm her as such, therefore I reject labeling her with the masculine apostolos which would conflict with the Greek scripture.
Note that 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐯𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐥𝐞s, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐰 𝐥𝐨𝐭𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧 𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐚𝐬, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐚𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐧,
𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐲 Godly 𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭, 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐭𝐲 𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐛, and Mary the mother of Jesus.
Later, when there was a need for deacons, they chose from among "seven men of good report" and selected Stephen.
“And He gave some to be apostles, and some prophets, and some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers
Dec. 2023
Rory Moore

Apostle-ette Junia? Let's chat.

 


Junia ???

Some of my readers came to me asserting "Junia" was an apostle and anonymous sent me the above book. If you want our review of it , it is in the second half of this post.
The bottom line is that the author utterly failed to prove Junia to be an apostle, but concluded anyway, "JUNIA WAS AN APOSTLE!" 

When I pointed out the problems in making Junia into an apostle, their assertions included a few labels such as inferring me as being a “misogynist” , anti-female, and other terms. 

Because of my own exhaustive dive into scripture regarding men, women, ministry, the words used, who they applied to, and the several revelations pertaining to this subject, the results triggered some people to the point of making false accusations.

Let's test the assertion made by friends that Junia was an apostle..

1. apostle is "apostolos" in the Greek, a masculine noun. Like husband, brother, prophet. 
2. Jesus chose 12 men. There were many Godly women around Him.

3. Paul credited Junia and Andronica as fellow prisoners, kinsmen, and that they were both "IN CHRIST" before him.

This means they were serving the Lord before Paul's conversion. 
Yet there was no mention of either Andronicus or Junia named as apostles ever.

4. Paul and Barnabbas were the first apostles added and named as apostles in Acts 13. Prior to them, there are no other apostles named after Acts 1 when the Eleven were mentioned, and they cast lots to replace Judas who fell.

At that time, Two MEN were selected from among the disciples in Acts 1,  and the Lord's lot fell upon Matthias. Godly women were there, but they chose from the men.

Acts 1:23  they appointed two: Joseph called Barsabas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthias.

24 And they prayed and said, “Thou, Lord, who knows the hearts of all men, show us which of these two Thou hast chosen,
25 that he may take part of this ministry and apostleship from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.” 

26 And they cast their lots, and the lot fell upon Matthias;
and  he was numbered with the eleven apostles.

5. 𝐒𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐉𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐚 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐀𝐧𝐝𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 "𝐢𝐧 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐭" 𝐛𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥 𝐜𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐢𝐧 𝐀𝐜𝐭𝐬 𝟏𝟑,  𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝐞𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐉𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐚 𝐨𝐫 𝐀𝐧𝐝𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐬 being "𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧",

6. They want to apostle-atize Junia but look, there were TWO people "of note among the apostles":

"ANDRONICUS and Junia, my kinsmen and my fellow prisoners, who are of note among the apostles and who also were in Christ before me"

Andronicus gets unequal "of note among the apostles" attention yet he is with Junia in that mention.  There is no evidence for Andronicus being an apostle either.

-it seems quite the stretch to turn Junia into an apostle based on this one phrase:
"Greet Andronicus and  Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellow-prisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also have been in Christ before me."

With no prior record of either Junia nor Andonicus being called an apostle, and no reference of her being one in any other mention of the names of the other apostles like Barnabbas, Epaphroditus, Silvanus, Timothy, and Lukes writing in Acts, 
𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐎𝐍𝐋𝐘 𝐀𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓𝐋𝐄𝐒 NAMED 𝐁𝐄𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐄 𝐏𝐀𝐔𝐋 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐁𝐀𝐑𝐍𝐀𝐁𝐁𝐀𝐒 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝟏𝟏 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐚𝐬.

And brethren, 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝑱𝒖𝒅𝒂𝒔 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒆𝒅, 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒚 𝒄𝒉𝒐𝒔𝒆 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝑻𝑾𝑶 𝑴𝑬𝑵.
-
𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒈𝒉 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒘𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒏𝒖𝒎𝒆𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒔 𝒘𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒏 𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒕𝒐𝒈𝒆𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒘𝒉𝒐 𝒉𝒂𝒅 𝒔𝒆𝒆𝒏 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒅 𝑱𝒆𝒔𝒖𝒔 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕.
There is no Biblical record of Junia as an apostle (apostolos noun-masculine) nor Andronicus, both are mentioned, and Paul said they were “in Christ” before him.

𝐈 𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐫𝐚𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐫𝐞-𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐉𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐚.

Why did I receive such strong rebukes with false accusations and some name-calling?

It seems the Lord led me to search the connection to Junia as a name.
From several websites:
Name Junia. Meaning. “queen of heaven”.
Feminine of Junio.  LATIN ORIGIN”. 
As with “Jezebel”, “Mary”, “Diana”, these names are attached to by deceiving spirits and thus doctrines of devils. Repeatedly we have seen women and men that give place to it triggered into responses that are not of Christ.

Apostolos is a masculine noun.
 Junia is a feminine proper name.
 Andronicus is a masculine name.

A Greek friend I have on Facebook confirmed it is a masculine noun. When we first met, I asked him, since it is his name, and as he is Greek, if girls were ever named as apostolos.
He “lol‘d and gave me a firm  No".

"THEY SAY THEY ARE APOSTLES.."?
Rev 2:2  I know thy works, and thy labor, and thy patience, and how thou cannot bear them which are evil: and you have tried them which say: “ they are apostles”, and are not, and have found them liars:

Is there room for the “they say Junia was an apostle” to be tested in that warning? One might give thought to that. I found my detractors also held other false beliefs. One also asserted Joseph fathered Jesus. 

Last note.
Eph 4:11  And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers;  ALL the overseer functions are MASCULINE NOUNS.

Women are equal to men in Christ, but not the same in function. 
In a body, the hand is not more important than the eye, they are equal in importance but different in function. So it is with men and women in Christ.
The scriptures define function and use in all of us.

God gave instructions to men, and different instructions to women.
He gave examples for each. 
He gave instructions for children, employers, and employees in Christ.
All are loved and equal as brethren, but each has separate and defined instructions.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>,<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

ORIGINAL POST Review FROM< FACEBOOK:

Someone sent me the book, "JUNIA A Woman An Apostle".
My wife Linda said "let's see what it says". I agreed.
She sat to read it aloud, and then as she noted and reacted to various points, we went through it together in the interest of fairness, and to see how solid a case might be made. regarding Junia being an apostle.
We operated on Paul's command to "prove <test> all things".
-𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨, 𝐩𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐢𝐢, 𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐬.
The author had 3 major points and spent a LOT of verbiage on them, little to no scripture.
1. Was Junia a woman or a man?
This question took up about 35+ pages total over 9 chapters.
𝑻𝒐 𝒎𝒆 𝒊𝒕 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒏𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒂𝒏 𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒖𝒆. 𝑺𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒏 𝒘𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒏 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝑹𝒐𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒔 16𝒕𝒉 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒑𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂 𝒏𝒖𝒎𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒄 𝒑𝒂𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒏 as a witness..
For numerous reasons I would argue against anyone claiming Junia was a man. (without the need for 5,000 words).
2. He spent a lot of time explaining and defining "apostle", proving whether it should be translated "apostle" or "messenger".
Again, a LOT of verbiage for a short and easy point.
The word "apostle" or "apostolos" is easily recognizable even in its' Greek form.
𝑯𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒉𝒆 𝒆𝒊𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒅 𝒐𝒓 𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒅 𝒂𝒍𝒕𝒐𝒈𝒆𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒛𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒐𝒇 the word "𝒂𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒍𝒐𝒔" 𝒊𝒏 𝒊𝒕𝒔' 𝒅𝒆𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 and application to the men that were called and served as apostles.
Spanish words have gender just as do Hebrew and Greek.
A husband is "esposo". Wife is "esposa".
An apostle is "apostolos". There is no feminine form for it.
A man, prophet, is "prophetes".
A woman that prophesies is "prophetess", and does have a feminine form, "propheteis".
He missed that.
He overlooked that all the apostles in Acts 1 were male, that they selected a replacement for Judas from among two men,
-and that two more men were called to be apostles in Acts 13,
and that there were no mentions of any female apostles in Acts, even though there were "prophetesses" mentioned.
2a. He spent 11 chapters in 35 pages on "was she an apostle" or "known to the "apostles".
𝐇𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐬:
𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐡𝐞 "𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐬"?
𝐨𝐫 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐡𝐞 "𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐥𝐞?"
Again, he ignored "apostolos" at this juncture being noun-masculine as it is in the other 78 places where apostles are mentioned.
-and in those 79 references, not one female is referenced as an apostle.
-unless you stretchhhhhh the scripture to apply a masculine noun upon Junia.
He cites numerous scholars, arguments, and translations, none of which were conclusive or definitive despite their arguments, and 154 pages total, with a lot of inconclusive verbiage.
In one chapter, he refers to "Burr and Wallace", projects and accuses their view as being biased, patriarchal, then goes into a lot of word-technicalities in the Greek, and in my opinion, falls into the morass of complex word-hair-splitting and arguments over translations.
It was tedious and boring, frankly without fresh insight or Spirit-given revelation.
We had to read and re-read numerous sentences trying to understand points made from the Greek that he said were technical but simple. They were anything but. Sometimes I asked Linda to re-read a sentence or paragraph 3-4 times trying to make sense of his "simple" ideas.
So instead without ever putting forth a definitive corollary scripture, or proof from the scholars he cited for support, he summed up 154 pages in the final 2-page chapter with the conclusion:
"Junia is a woman apostle".
-Which is what the scriptures never said.
Thus, he concludes,
"the question has been answered most emphatically Junia was among the apostles". Page 153
-After failing utterly to prove his assertion and making something simple, into a complicated argument and a needless writing.
As he ended with his own view, made several absurd statements, ( I can quote them), a few arguments from silence, blames some scholars and translators as being anti-female, and in the final chapter as we looked for conclusive proof, it was not there!
𝐌𝐲 𝐰𝐢𝐟𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐭𝐞𝐫, "𝐰𝐞𝐚𝐤 𝐚𝐬 𝐰𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫".
No clear cut definitive proof, and as there are so many conflicting books and ideas about God and His Word, this underscores the wisdom of my repenting of seeking truth from the confusion and conflicts in the church world.
He ignored 2Timothy 2:12, he failed to note the chronology in Acts where there were 12 apostles until Acts 13, where Paul and Barnabbas were appointed and called.
I am sorry for the ones supporting this false teaching.
It is no different than those that firmly believe God is three beings, or that Jesus is God, when there is no direct scripture for those conclusions.
For you the "Junia" book sender:
The name "Junia" means "queen of heaven".
I can expand on that, and the difference with Mary the mother of Jesus, and Mary as an idol and feminine power that is spiritually attached to "her", but that is for another time.
Thank you for reaffirming the wisdom of me going to the Lord for truth and understanding and not to man.
I forgive those that insulted and slandered my conviction to seek God first in HIS WORD.
The book you sent me is noted, highlighted, and marked.
To me it is astonishing someone could write a book to try and prove something the scripture does not say, and did so by relying on the words of others rather than having total dependence on God's Word.
The fact that in both Greek and Hebrew, nouns have gender that designate their proper application to either of the two sexes, escaped the writer in the 154 pages plus intro.
Summary.
The author WANTS to believe Junia was an apostle,
just like many WANT to believe in a rapture,
and people want to believe God is three persons,
WANT to believe their pastor is telling them the truth about tithing,
WANT to believe their church is right,
WANT to believe there is a no hell-judgement,
WANT to believe when not one scripture says those things.
And THAT is how people are deceived by the "leaven" in Churchianity.